Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

Current Diabetes Reviews

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1573-3998
ISSN (Online): 1875-6417

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Journal Insight Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe
Research Article

The Efficacy of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) on Healing of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Literature Review

Author(s): Dwi Ari Murti Widigdo*, Zaenal Muttaqien Sofro, Heny Suseani Pangastuti and Ishandono Dachlan

Volume 20, Issue 8, 2024

Published on: 26 October, 2023

Article ID: e111023222109 Pages: 11

DOI: 10.2174/0115733998229877230926073555

Price: $65

conference banner
Abstract

Background: Diabetes mellitus is a complex disorder that requires continuous management to control blood sugar levels and prevent complications. Diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) are the most common complication in diabetic patients. A popular therapy modality with considerable advantages in the management of diabetic foot ulcers today is negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT).

Objective: This study aimed to review related articles about the efficacy as well as the complications or adverse effects of using NPWT on the healing of DFUs.

Methods: Searching English databases from PubMed, Ebscohost, Proquest and Science Direct was done to identify relevant citations published between January 2017 and January 2022. A combination of terms was used with the boolean formulation of “negative pressure wound therapy OR NPWT” OR “vacuum-assisted closure or VAC” AND “diabetic foot ulcers OR diabetic foot wound” AND “wound healing” AND “Conventional dressings” and map terms were also used for the subject heading. Some potentially relevant citations of articles from the bibliographies are also reviewed.

Results: This study included 8 related articles consisting of 6 RCTs, 1 cohort study and 1 Quasy experimental study. There were various methodological techniques for using NPWT and outcome measures among studies. The results of this literature review showed that NPWT was more efficacious than the other conventional or advanced moist dressings. This therapy revealed a faster healing time with complete wound healing and formation of granulation tissue and reduction in wound size. The complications or adverse effects of NPWT, such as amputation rate, bleeding and pain, were not different from conventional or advanced moist dressings, though.

Conclusion: NPWT was more efficacious than other conventional or advanced moist dressings for the healing of DFUs. However, complications or adverse effects of using this therapy showed no significant difference with other conventional or advanced moist dressings.

Keywords: Negative pressure wound therapy, diabetic foot ulcers, wound healing, RCTs, granulation tissue, diabetes mellitus.

[1]
Holt P. Assessment and management of patients with diabetic foot ulcers. Nurs Stand 2013; 27(27): 49-55.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7748/ns2013.03.27.27.49.e7284] [PMID: 23556307]
[2]
Vinik AI, Erbas T, Casellini CM. Diabetic cardiac autonomic neuropathy, inflammation and cardiovascular disease. J Diabetes Investig 2013; 4(1): 4-18.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.12042] [PMID: 23550085]
[3]
Association AD. Diabetes statistics 2018. Available from: www.diabetes.org/diabetes-statistics.jsp
[4]
Ricco J-B, Thanh Phong L, Schneider F, et al. The diabetic foot: A review. J Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 54(6): 755-62.
[PMID: 24126512]
[5]
Diabetic foot ulcers. 2018. Available from: https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/460282-overview (Accessed on: Jul. 20, 2018)
[6]
Doupis J, Veves A. Classification, diagnosis, and treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. Wounds 2008; 20(5): 117-26.
[PMID: 25942412]
[7]
Mat Saad AZ, Khoo TL, Halim AS. Wound bed preparation for chronic diabetic foot ulcers. ISRN Endocrinol 2013; 2013: 1-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/608313] [PMID: 23476800]
[8]
Toshev S, Grueva L. Managing ulcers of diabetic foot. Vizione. 2017; pp. 59-69.
[9]
Mulder G, Tenenhaus M, D’Souza GF. Reduction of diabetic foot ulcer healing times through use of advanced treatment modalities. Int J Low Extrem Wounds 2014; 13(4): 335-46.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1534734614557925] [PMID: 25384916]
[10]
Futrega K, King M, Lott WB, Doran MR. Treating the whole not the hole: Necessary coupling of technologies for diabetic foot ulcer treatment. Trends Mol Med 2014; 20(3): 137-42.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2013.12.004] [PMID: 24485902]
[11]
Vikatmaa P, Juutilainen V, Kuukasjärvi P, Malmivaara A. Negative pressure wound therapy: A systematic review on effectiveness and safety. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2008; 36(4): 438-48.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.06.010] [PMID: 18675559]
[12]
Wainstein J, Feldbrin Z, Boaz M, Harman-Boehm I. Efficacy of ozone-oxygen therapy for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetes Technol Ther 2011; 13(12): 1255-60.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2011.0018] [PMID: 21751891]
[13]
Dumville JC, Hinchliffe RJ, Cullum N, Game F, Stubbs N, Sweeting M. Negative pressure wound therapy for treating foot wounds in people with diabetes mellitus. In: Dumville JC, Ed. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2013.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010318]
[14]
Malmsjö M, Ingemansson R, Martin R, Huddleston E. Wound edge microvascular blood flow: Effects of negative pressure wound therapy using gauze or polyurethane foam. Ann Plast Surg 2009; 63(6): 676-81.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e31819ae01b] [PMID: 19887926]
[15]
Xie X, McGregor M, Dendukuri N. The clinical effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy: A systematic review. J Wound Care 2010; 19(11): 490-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2010.19.11.79697] [PMID: 21135797]
[16]
Sibbald RG, Elliott JA, Ayello EA, Somayaji R. Optimizing the moisture management tightrope with wound bed preparation 2015©. Adv Skin Wound Care 2015; 28(10): 466-76.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000470851.27030.98] [PMID: 26375950]
[17]
Raj M, Gill SP, Sheopaltan SK, et al. Evaluation of vacuum assisted closure therapy for soft tissue injury in open musculoskeletal trauma. J Clin Diagn Res 2016; 10(4): RC05-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2016/17449.7598] [PMID: 27190906]
[18]
Haddaway NR, Page MJ, Pritchard CC, McGuinness LA. PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis. Campbell Syst Rev 2022; 18(2): e1230.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1230] [PMID: 36911350]
[19]
Sureshkumar S, James SMD, Elamurugan T, Debasis N, Vijayakumar C, Palanivel C. Comparison of vacuum-assisted closure therapy and conventional dressing on wound healing in patients with diabetic foot ulcer: A randomized controlled trial. Niger J Surg 2019; 25(1): 14-20.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/njs.NJS_14_18] [PMID: 31007506]
[20]
Malekpour Alamdari N, Mehraneroodi B, Gholizadeh B, Zeinalpour A, Safe P, Besharat S. The efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy compared with conventional dressing in treating infected diabetic foot ulcers: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries 2021; 41(4): 664-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13410-021-00941-9]
[21]
Sheen NA, Samar AM, Butt MI, Ayub Z, Nadeem F. Efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy in early diabetic foot ulcer management in comparison with advanced moist wound therapy. PAFMJ 2021; 71(6): 2087-90.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v6i6.6231]
[22]
Satasia R, Solanki K, Katara S. Conventional dressings versus vacuum-assisted closure and hydrojel dressing in the management of diabetic foot ulcers  A prospective case – control study. NJRM 2017; 8(3): 130-4.
[23]
Farooq SOHAIL, Javed S, Jahan N. Diabetic foot ulcers. Prof Med J 2019; 26(2)
[http://dx.doi.org/10.29309/TPMJ/2019.26.02.3116]
[24]
Maranna H, Lal P, Mishra A, et al. Negative pressure wound therapy in grade 1 and 2 diabetic foot ulcers: A randomized controlled study. Diabetes Metab Syndr 2021; 15(1): 365-71.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2021.01.014] [PMID: 33524646]
[25]
Abdullah Al-Mallah ABAA-S, Al-Mallah A, Al-Sayed A. Negative pressure wound therapy versus conventional dressing in treatment of diabetic foot wound. Egypt J Hosp Med 2018; 72(3): 4054-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.21608/ejhm.2018.9115]
[26]
Elbadawy A, Hasaballah A, Aboloyoun H, Ezeldeen M. Impact of negative pressure wound therapy in complete healing rates following surgical debridement in heel and ankle regions in diabetic foot infections. Egypt J Surg 2019; 38(1): 165.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ejs.ejs_180_18]
[27]
Sharma D, Singh B, Jaswal KS, Thakur V, Nanda V, Nabh R. Effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy in the management of chronic diabetic ulcers: A prospective study. Int Surg J 2017; 4(4): 1313.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20171134]
[28]
Chen L. A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer. Ann Palliat Med 2021; 10(10): 10830-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/apm-21-2476]
[29]
Liu S, Chao-Zhu H, Yan-Ting C. Evaluation of negative-pressure wound therapy for patients with diabetic foot ulcers: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2017; 13: 533-44.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S131193]
[30]
Wynn M, Freeman S. The efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy for diabetic foot ulcers: A systematised review. J Tissue Viability 2019; 28(3): 152-60.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2019.04.001] [PMID: 31056407]
[31]
Seidel D, Storck M, Lawall H, et al. Negative pressure wound therapy compared with standard moist wound care on diabetic foot ulcers in real-life clinical practice: results of the German DiaFu-RCT. BMJ Open 2020; 10(3): e026345.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026345] [PMID: 32209619]
[32]
Zens Y, Barth M, Bucher HC, et al. Negative pressure wound therapy in patients with wounds healing by secondary intention: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Syst Rev 2020; 9(1): 238.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01476-6] [PMID: 33038929]
[33]
Nather A. Role of negative pressure wound therapy in healing of diabetic foot ulcers. J Surg Tech Case Rep 2011; 3(1): 10-1.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2006-8808.78463]
[34]
Hanley ME, Manna B. Hyperbaric Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcer. StatPearls Publishing LLC 2023.
[35]
Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, Boulton AJM. Negative pressure wound therapy via vacuum-assisted closure following partial foot amputation: What is the role of wound chronicity? Int Wound J 2007; 4(1): 79-86.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-481X.2006.00270.x] [PMID: 17425550]
[36]
Lalezari S, Lee CJ, Borovikova AA, et al. Deconstructing negative pressure wound therapy. Int Wound J 2017; 14(4): 649-57.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12658] [PMID: 27681204]
[37]
Kim PJ, Silverman R, Attinger CE, Griffin L. Comparison of negative pressure wound therapy with and without instillation of saline in the management of infected wounds. Cureus 2020; 12(7): e9047.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.9047] [PMID: 32782866]
[38]
Ji S, Liu X, Huang J, et al. Consensus on the application of negative pressure wound therapy of diabetic foot wounds. Burns Trauma 2021; 9(3002): tkab018.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkab018] [PMID: 34212064]
[39]
Dong JY, Song F, Qing C, Lu SL. Histomorphological observation of surgical debridement combined with negative pressure therapy in treatment of diabetic foot. Chin J Traumatol 2017; 20(4): 202-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2016.08.004] [PMID: 28526612]
[40]
Strom HS, Marjolein MI, Jannicke I, et al. Severity and duration of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) before seeking care as predictors of healing time: A retrospective cohort study. PLoS One 2017; 12(5): e0177176.
[41]
Simbolon P, Ibrahim H. Risk factors that influence hospital length of stay in diabetic foot ulcer with negative pressure wound therapy at RS. dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo. J Surg 2020; 5(1): 20-4.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7454/nrjs.v5i1.1069]
[42]
Xia C, Yu A, Qi B, Zhou M, Li Z, Wang W. Analysis of blood flow and local expression of angiogenesis associated growth factors in infected wounds treated with negative pressure wound therapy. Mol Med Rep 2014; 9(5): 1749-54.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2014.1997]
[43]
Scherer SS, Pietramaggiori G, Mathews JC, Prsa MJ, Huang S, Orgill DP. The mechanism of action of the vacuum-assisted closure device. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122(3): 786-97.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31818237ac] [PMID: 18766042]
[44]
Tanaka T, Panthee N, Itoda Y, Yamauchi N, Fukayama M, Ono M. Negative pressure wound therapy induces early wound healing by increased and accelerated expression of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors. Eur J Plast Surg 2016; 39(4): 247-56.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00238-016-1200-z] [PMID: 27512293]
[45]
Mattox EA. Reducing risks associated with negative-pressure wound therapy: Strategies for clinical practice. Crit Care Nurse 2017; 37(5): 67-77.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4037/ccn2017308] [PMID: 28966197]
[46]
Swanson EW, Cheng HT, Susarla SM, Lough DM, Kumar AR. Does negative pressure wound therapy applied to closed incisions following ventral hernia repair prevent wound complications and hernia recurrence? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Surg 2016; 24(2): 113-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/229255031602400207] [PMID: 27441196]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
Article Metrics
30
2
Wayfinder Image
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy