![conference banner](/images/conference-banner.jpeg)
Abstract
Introduction: Bioconjugations are swiftly progressing and are being applied to solve several limitations of conventional Drug Delivery Systems (DDS) such as lack of water solubility, non-specific, and poor bioavailability. The main goals of DDS are to achieve greater drug effectiveness and minimize toxicity to the healthy tissues.
Objectives and Methods: In this study, D-glucose was conjugated with eugenol to target the cancer cells. To identify the implication of the anticancer effect, osteosarcoma (K7M2) cells were cultured and the anti-proliferative effect was performed using MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol- 2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide assay] test in order to evaluate the viability and toxicity on cells with various concentrations of eugenol and D-glucose-eugenol conjugate in 24-hour incubation.
Results: It was found that, the successful confirmation of the conjugation between D-glucose and eugenol was obtained by 1H NMR spectroscopy. MTT assay showed inhibitory concentration (IC50 value) of D-glucose-eugenol was at 96.2 μg/ml and the decreased of osteosarcoma cell survival was 48%.
Conclucion: These findings strongly indicate that K7M2 cells would be affected by toxicity of Dglucose- eugenol. Therefore, the present study suggests that D-glucose-eugenol has high potential to act as an anti-proliferative agent who may promise a new modality or approach as the drug delivery treatment for cancer or chemotherapeutic agent.
Keywords: Conjugation, D-glucose, eugenol, Drug Delivery Systems (DDS), cancer treatment, osteosarcoma (K7M2).
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41568-019-0110-3] [PMID: 30683893]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2014.09.041] [PMID: 25288186]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02570-z] [PMID: 31530905]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013] [PMID: 21376230]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-7847.65322] [PMID: 22228938]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.03.053] [PMID: 24747160]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2018.06.005] [PMID: 30581608]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C9RA08599H]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.07.004] [PMID: 31295542]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2016.01.061] [PMID: 26890119]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yexmp.2010.08.006] [PMID: 20804748]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.12111177] [PMID: 22438441]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcp.20166] [PMID: 15389572]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12253-012-9500-5] [PMID: 22270867]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2017.04.034] [PMID: 28461244]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1615/CritRevOncog.v18.i1-2.40] [PMID: 23237552]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c3sc22205e] [PMID: 24077675]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2353/ajpath.2009.080596] [PMID: 19286567]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-13-237] [PMID: 23672493]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C6MD00287K] [PMID: 28042452]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2006.11.006] [PMID: 17161643]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M411429200] [PMID: 15574415]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2020.108938] [PMID: 31926151]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.022426-0] [PMID: 20724513]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1934578X1000501236] [PMID: 21299140]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00819]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C9OB00691E] [PMID: 31099373]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tet.2005.08.031]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.9790/5736-0614551]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.201505704] [PMID: 26211515]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jm501371s] [PMID: 25565044]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ed068p1003]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ma951810b]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2019.03.038] [PMID: 30914352]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1960.tb39103.x] [PMID: 13743911]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001813-199809000-00007] [PMID: 9823430]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b06937] [PMID: 27570149]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C3FO60514K] [PMID: 24336787]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s001250051591] [PMID: 11270668]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cb300426u] [PMID: 23138692]
![Wayfinder Image](/images/wayfinder.jpg)