Abstract
Background: α-Glucosidase is a hydrolyzing enzyme that plays a crucial role in the degradation of carbohydrates and starch to glucose. Hence, α-glucosidase is an important target in carbohydrate mediated diseases such as diabetes mellitus.
Objective: In this study, novel coumarin containing dithiocarbamate derivatives 4a-n were synthesized and evaluated against α-glucosidase in vitro and in silico.
Methods: These compounds were obtained from the reaction between 4-(bromomethyl)-7- methoxy-2H-chromen-2-one 1, carbon disulfide 2, and primary or secondary amines 3a-n in the presence of potassium hydroxide and ethanol at room temperature. In vitro α-glucosidase inhibition and kinetic study of these compounds were performed. Furthermore, a docking study of the most potent compounds was also performed by Auto Dock Tools (version 1.5.6).
Results: Obtained results showed that all the synthesized compounds exhibited prominent inhibitory activities (IC50 = 85.0 ± 4.0-566.6 ± 8.6 μM) in comparison to acarbose as a standard inhibitor (IC50 = 750.0 ± 9.0 μM). Among them, the secondary amine derivative 4d with pendant indole group was the most potent inhibitor. Enzyme kinetic study of the compound 4d revealed that this compound competes with a substrate to connect to the active site of α-glucosidase and therefore is a competitive inhibitor. Moreover, a molecular docking study predicted that this compound interacted with the α-glucosidase active site pocket.
Conclusion: Our results suggest that the coumarin-dithiocarbamate scaffold can be a promising lead structure for designing potent α-glucosidase inhibitors for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.
Keywords: Anti-diabetic activity, α-glucosidase, molecular docking, coumarin, dithiocarbamate, in vitro evaluation.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/diab.37.12.1595] [PMID: 3056758]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2165/00003495-200363130-00004] [PMID: 12825962]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.54.1.1] [PMID: 15616004]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.10.017] [PMID: 15019860]
[PMID: 8001624]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-124-10-199605150-00030] [PMID: 8610937]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2362.1994.tb02251.x] [PMID: 8001622]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cbic.200900025] [PMID: 19294724]
[PMID: 7540952]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.21.11878] [PMID: 10518544]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2013.12.024] [PMID: 24398385]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1381612811319210013] [PMID: 23438968]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1568026616666160824104655] [PMID: 27558678]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2015.09.004] [PMID: 26432614]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C8NJ02495B]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jm100757r] [PMID: 21053896]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2018.06.035] [PMID: 29980114]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2019.04.082]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2017.09.003] [PMID: 28926784]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2018.03.015] [PMID: 29587132]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2013.10.047] [PMID: 24239622]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.05.046] [PMID: 29902721]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.10.017] [PMID: 26491979]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cbdd.12666] [PMID: 26362113]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn750] [PMID: 18931379]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2018.05.021] [PMID: 29864686]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2018.10.010] [PMID: 30321778]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1573399815666190618093315] [PMID: 31237215]
![Wayfinder Image](/images/wayfinder.jpg)