Generic placeholder image

Current Genomics

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1389-2029
ISSN (Online): 1875-5488

Research Article

Genomic Face-Off: An In Silico Comparison of the Probiotic Potential of Lactobacillus spp. and Akkermansia muciniphila

In Press, (this is not the final "Version of Record"). Available online 23 August, 2024
Author(s): Nayeema Bulbul, Jinath Sultana, Ashrafus Safa, Md. Asaduzzaman Shishir, Bakhtiar Ul Islam, Md. Fakruddin* and Md. Abu Bakar karim
Published on: 23 August, 2024

DOI: 10.2174/0113892029317403240815044408

Price: $95

Open Access Journals Promotions 2
Abstract

Introduction: The gut microbiota plays a crucial role in maintaining human health, and probiotics have gained significant attention for their potential benefits. Among the diverse array of gut bacteria, Akkermansia muciniphila, and Lactobacillus spp. have emerged as promising candidates for their putative probiotic properties.

Method: In this study, we conducted a comprehensive comparative in silico analysis of the genomes of A. muciniphila and Lactobacillus to decipher their probiotic potential. Utilizing a range of bioinformatics tools, we evaluated various genomic attributes, including functional gene content, metabolic pathways, antimicrobial peptide production, adhesion factors, and stress response elements. These findings revealed distinctive genomic signatures between the two genera. A. muciniphila genomes exhibited a high prevalence of mucin-degrading enzymes, suggesting a specialized adaptation for mucin utilization in the gut environment.

Results: Additionally, the presence of specific pathways for short-chain fatty acid production highlighted its potential impact on host health. Lactobacillus genomes, on the other hand, demonstrated a diverse repertoire of functional genes associated with probiotic attributes, including the production of antimicrobial peptides and adhesion factors, indicating potential for host-microbe interactions and immune modulation. Furthermore, this analysis unveiled the genetic basis of stress tolerance in both genera, revealing conserved mechanisms for surviving the dynamic conditions of the gut ecosystem.

Conclusion: This study also shed light on the distribution of antibiotic-resistance genes, allowing us to assess safety concerns associated with their potential use as probiotics. Overall, this comparative in silico exploration provides valuable insights into the genomic foundation of A. muciniphila and Lactobacillus probiotic potential. These findings contribute to the understanding of their respective roles within the gut microbiota and offer a foundation for further experimental investigations. As probiotic applications continue to expand, this study advances our knowledge of the genetic underpinnings that govern their functionality and highlights promising avenues for future therapeutic interventions and personalized health strategies.

Keywords: In silico, genome, sequence, probiotic, Akkermansia muciniphila, Lactobacillus.


Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy