Similarities and Differences Among Adolescents Who Communicate Suicidality to Others via Electronic Versus other Means: A Pilot Study

ISSN: 2210-6774 (Online)
ISSN: 2210-6766 (Print)


Volume 6, 4 Issues, 2016


Download PDF Flyer




Adolescent Psychiatry

Aims & ScopeAbstracted/Indexed in


Submit Abstracts Online Submit Manuscripts Online

Editor-in-Chief:
Lois T. Flaherty
Harvard University Medical School
Cambridge, MA
USA


View Full Editorial Board

Subscribe Purchase Articles Order Reprints


Similarities and Differences Among Adolescents Who Communicate Suicidality to Others via Electronic Versus other Means: A Pilot Study



Adolescent Psychiatry, 2(3): 258-262.

Author(s): Erin L. Belfort, Enrico Mezzacappa and Katherine Ginnis.

Affiliation: Cambridge Hospital, 1493 Cambridge Street, Cambridge, MA 01239, USA.

Abstract

Objective: Anecdotally, we noticed an increasing number of adolescents evaluated in our psychiatric emergency room after sending an electronic communication (text message, instant message, email, social networking site posting) of suicidality. In this study we aimed to describe key similarities and differences among adolescents who communicated their suicidality to others via electronic versus other means.

Methods: We reviewed consecutive adolescent psychiatric emergency room assessments over a 4-year time period conducted at Children’s Hospital, Boston, a large tertiary care pediatric hospital, for the chief complaint of suicidality. We broadly defined suicidality as ideation, intent, plans, attempts, and other self-injurious behaviors. We ascertained how the patient communicated their suicidality, and to whom, and we obtained demographic and other pertinent clinical information.

Results: There were a total of 1,350 psychiatric evaluations done at Children’s Hospital, Boston for the chief complaint of suicidality during the study period. The vast majority (n = 1260) of patients communicated their suicidality verbally or via witnessed gesture. There were 54 who communicated suicidality via a hand-written note and 36 who communicated suicidality via electronic means. Patients in our comparison groups were demographically and clinically similar. One striking difference was to whom each group communicated their distress. Of those who communicated electronically, the majority, 67%, did so to a peer and only 33% to an adult, whereas those who communicated via written notes were more likely to do so to an adult. In the written note group, 7% communicated to a peer and 93% to an adult. Not surprisingly, the numbers of electronic communications of suicidality increased over the four-year study period from 2005 to 2009.

Conclusions: The increasing use of technology for communication among adolescents may mean that a peer is the first recipient of a ‘distress call’. Therefore, differential patterns of communication among adolescents with suicidality may have implications for their clinical management and the timely provision of needed services. Our findings also point to the importance of taking a media use history, particularly for adolescent patients who are high media users, and psychoeducational prevention programs in schools concerning appropriate responses to such calls. Replication is needed using prospective designs to conduct systematic inquiry about modes of communication used by suicidal adolescents.


Keywords:

Adolescent suicide, media, communication .



Purchase Online Order Reprints Order Eprints Rights and Permissions




Article Details

Volume: 2
Issue Number: 3
First Page: 258
Last Page: 262
Page Count: 5
DOI: 10.2174/2210676611202030258
Price: $58
Advertisement

Related Journals




Webmaster Contact: urooj@benthamscience.org Copyright © 2016 Bentham Science