Medico-Legal Issues with CTG Interpretation

ISSN: 1875-6581 (Online)
ISSN: 1573-4048 (Print)


Volume 10, 2 Issues, 2014


Download PDF Flyer




Current Women's Health Reviews

Aims & ScopeAbstracted/Indexed in


Submit Abstracts Online Submit Manuscripts Online

Editor-in-Chief:
John Yeh
Harvard Medical School
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, MA
USA


View Full Editorial Board

Subscribe Purchase Articles Order Reprints


Medico-Legal Issues with CTG Interpretation

Author(s): Vikram Sinai Talaulikar and Sabaratnam Arulkumaran

Affiliation: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St. George’s Hospital and University of London, Tooting - London, SW17 0RE, UK.

Abstract

Electronic fetal monitoring is the recommended method of intrapartum fetal surveillance in high risk pregnancies and the cardiotocography (CTG) forms an integral part of intrapartum care on most modern labour wards. Despite the questions about its efficacy and controversy regarding increased rates of operative delivery associated with its use, continuous CTG remains the predominant method of intrapartum fetal monitoring. Although CTG is sensitive in detecting abnormalities of fetal heart rate (FHR), its specificity for detection of fetal hypoxia is low and therefore confirmatory tests such as fetal scalp blood sampling or analysis of fetal electrocardiography (ECG) become necessary.

The intrapartum CTG trace forms a central piece of documentary evidence in litigations related to adverse perinatal outcomes which are alleged to have arisen due to events that took place during the labour and/or delivery of the baby. The main reasons for litigation are not just for recovery of costs determined by injury, pain, loss and future care of a brain damaged child; but the parents also want to know what happened and why, and expect the healthcare staff to be held accountable for their actions.

Majority of medico-legal cases have similar problems which can be laid down to a few factors such as - a) inability to interpret FHR trace, b) inappropriate action, c) technical aspects and d) record keeping.

Not only can litigations have long-term consequences for the working lives of midwives or obstetricians but they have been influential in changing practice trends such as rising caesarean rates. Unfortunately obstetric litigation with its huge costs is a growing problem and for the foreseeable future, the CTG is here to stay. The best defence against litigation is good clinical practice with adherence to evidence based guidelines and regular mandatory training in the interpretation of CTG for all labour ward staff. There should be a mechanism for the rapid review of adverse obstetric events and dissemination of key learning points to all staff.


Keywords: CTG, fetal, hypoxia, intrapartum, medico-legal, monitoring, surveillance.

Purchase Online Order Reprints Order Eprints Rights and Permissions

  
  



Article Details

Volume: 9
Issue Number: 3
First Page: 145
Last Page: 157
Page Count: 13
DOI: 10.2174/157340480903140131111540
Advertisement

Related Journals

Webmaster Contact: urooj@benthamscience.org Copyright © 2014 Bentham Science